That natural selection can produce changes within a type is disputed by no one, not even the staunchest creationist. But that it can transform one species into another — that, in fact, has never been observed.
Robert J. SawyerStichwörter: science biology evolution darwinism darwin natural-selection neo-darwinism speciation
Regardless of one's point of view, it's quite easy to see that Darwinism is not in the same league as the hard sciences. For instance, Darwinists will often compare their theory favorably to Einsteinian physics, claiming that Darwinism is just as well established as general relativity. Yet how many physicists, while arguing for the truth of Einsteinian physics, will claim that general relativity is as well established as Darwin’s theory? Zero.
William A. DembskiStichwörter: science einstein evolution darwinism macro-evolution macroevolution scientific-theory speciation general-relativity hard-science scientific-theories
Natural selection eliminates and maybe maintains, but it doesn't create... Neo-Darwinists say that new species emerge when mutations occur and modify an organism. I was taught over and over again that the accumulation of random mutations led to evolutionary change [which] led to new species. I believed it until I looked for evidence.
Lynn MargulisStichwörter: evolution darwinism natural-selection macro-evolution macroevolution speciation
New mutations don't create new species; they create offspring that are impaired.
Lynn MargulisStichwörter: evolution darwinism macro-evolution macroevolution speciation
Seite 1 von 1.
Data privacy
Imprint
Contact
Diese Website verwendet Cookies, um Ihnen die bestmögliche Funktionalität bieten zu können.