(Talking about the movement to deny the prevalence and effects of adult sexual exploitation of children)
So what does this movement consist of? Who are the movers and shakers? Well molesters are in it, of course. There are web pages telling them how to defend themselves against accusations, to retain confidence about their ‘loving and natural’ feelings for children, with advice on what lawyers to approach, how to complain, how to harass those helping their children. Then there’s the Men’s Movements, their web pages throbbing with excitement if they find ‘proof’ of conspiracy between feminists, divorcing wives and therapists to victimise men, fathers and husbands.
Then there are journalists. A few have been vitally important in the US and Britain in establishing the fightback, using their power and influence to distort the work of child protection professionals and campaign against children’s testimony. Then there are other journalists who dance in and out of the debates waggling their columns behind them, rarely observing basic journalistic manners, but who use this debate to service something else – a crack at the welfare state, standards, feminism, ‘touchy, feely, post-Diana victimhood’. Then there is the academic voice, landing in the middle of court cases or inquiries, offering ‘rational authority’. Then there is the government. During the entire period of discovery and denial, not one Cabinet minister made a statement about the prevalence of sexual abuse or the harm it caused.
Finally there are the ‘retractors’. For this movement to take off, it had to have ‘human interest’ victims – the accused – and then a happy ending – the ‘retractors’. We are aware that those ‘retractors’ whose parents trail them to newspapers, television studios and conferences are struggling. Lest we forget, they recanted under palpable pressure.
Tags: suffering denial society-denial government rape crime journalists victim political survivors criminal pressure child-abuse victims abusers child-protection sexual-abuse survivor crusade abuse child-sexual-abuse false-memories incest coercion accusations rapists pedophile sex-offenders hidden-motives paedophile accused-adults media-distortion media-manipulation misuse-of-power politicspolitics power-dynamics retractors
In this book we paint an unprecedented portrait of Britain’s first ‘false memory’ retraction and show that, like other ‘false memory’ cases which appeared in the public domain, memory itself was always a false trail – these women never forgot. We are not challenging people’s right to tell their own story and then to change it. But we do assert that the chance should be interpreted in the context that created it.
Thousands of accounts of sexual and physical abuse in childhood cannot be explained by a pseudo-scientific ‘syndrome’. We have been shifted to the wrong debate, a debate about the malignancy of survivors and their allies, rather than those who have hurt them. That’s why the arguments have become so elusive. […]
Tags: suffering denial government rape crime journalists victim political survivors criminal pressure child-abuse victims abusers child-protection sexual-abuse survivor crusade abuse false-memories incest coercion accusations rapists pedophile sex-offenders hidden-motives paedophile misuse-of-power power-dynamics retractors
Facing a deteriorating economy and a weakening hold over the populace, the Iraqi state under Saddam Hussein opted to revitalize tribal leaders and conservative practices as a means of stabilizing state power; those conservative practices were not an inherent feature of a predominantly Muslim country.
Nadje Al-AliTags: politics men women foreign-policy economics state government islam iraq saddam-hussein iraqi-state
What did “good government” really mean? Langlie and his brotherhood promised an end to political corruption. (There’s no evidence that Langlie ever even took a drink, much less a bribe.) The days of “honest graft” were over, at least for a while. But seen from another perspective—that of ordinary citizens without access to Langlie and Abram’s elite network—Langlie didn’t so much end corruption as legalize it. Langlie wasn’t opposed to a government organized around the interests of the greedy; he just didn’t want to have to break the law to serve them.
Jeff SharletTags: united-states government legality political-corruption bribery arthur-b-langlie
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity, especially when it comes to bureaucrats in a government who has no clueabout money matters
Ziad K. AbdelnourTags: money power stupidity government bureaucrats
The challenge has always been that "good people" don't know how to win elections
Fela DurotoyeTags: politics elections government leadership
We have a government of limited power under the Constitution, and we have got to work out our problems on the basis of law.
William Howard TaftTags: government constitutional-law limited-powers
Everything is temporary. Well, except government programs.
Brooke BidaTags: anarchy government libertarian
The governments and their policies have failed, the church is the last hope of the common man, I value a church that is a home for all.
Ifeanyi Enoch OnuohaTags: church government
A hereditary monarch is as absurd a position as a hereditary doctor or mathematician.
Thomas PaineTags: government king heredity ruling
« first previous
Page 56 of 63.
next last »
Data privacy
Imprint
Contact
Diese Website verwendet Cookies, um Ihnen die bestmögliche Funktionalität bieten zu können.